|
DNA test nullifies child support
arrearage
January 25, 2002
After a DNA test proved conclusively that
Nicholas Walter was not the biological father of a child, the Court
of Appeals ruled that any outstanding child support arrearage was
discharged
In 1993, Michele Gunter filed a paternity action
against Nicholas Todd Walter, alleging that he was the father of her
child. Based upon Gunter’s representations that she had not had
sexual relations with any other man, Walter consented to an order
declaring him the father of the child. The court ordered Walter to
pay Gunter child support in the amount of $43 per week.
Walter failed to pay much in the way of support.
Nevertheless, in March 2000, Walter filed a motion for the court to
order genetic testing to establish whether he was indeed the father.
The testing proved that Walter could not be the father. As a result,
the trial court relieved Walter of any prospective obligation to pay
child support, but refused to absolve him of his obligation to pay
the child support arrearage in the amount of $11,228 that had
accrued through the date Walter requested the DNA testing. Walter
appealed, and the Court of Appeals of Maryland heard his case.
The Court of Appeals, in a split decision, reversed
the ruling of the circuit court, and held that Walter did not have
any obligation to pay any portion of the arrearage, saying, “we hold
that Walter cannot be legally obligated for child support arrearages
that result from a now-vacated paternity judgment.”
In a stinging dissent, Judge Wilner argued that the
Court’s decision rewarded Walter for his defiance of the child
support order entered seven years earlier. Judge Wilner wrote:
“In the name of protecting the rights of men who father
children and then walk away from them, the Court of Appeals has so
dismantled the system for enforcing child support collection that,
unless you are expecting a tax refund, are looking to the win the
lottery, or are truly concerned about driving on a suspended license,
there will be no effective sanction, and, if the time ever comes,
years later, when you may be held to account, ask for a blood test. If
you are lucky, you will escape all responsibility and may, when the
next case is decided, actually be able to force your child to return
anything you were ever forced to pay.”
In defense of the majority opinion, Judge Battaglia noted that child
support is a duty imposed by the law upon natural parents.
Consequently, “a vacated paternity judgment effectively extinguishes
that ‘legal duty arising from or imposed by law,’ and as that duty is
extinguished, so too is the financial obligation attached to that
duty.”
Walter v. Gunter,
Court of Appeals of Maryland, No. 41, Sept. Term, 2001, decided
January 9, 2002
[Return to Family Law Update Page] |