Contact Us Our Attorneys Frequently Asked Questions Directions to our Location Back to Home
   

DNA test nullifies child support arrearage
January 25, 2002

After a DNA test proved conclusively that Nicholas Walter was not the biological father of a child, the Court of Appeals ruled that any outstanding child support arrearage was discharged

In 1993, Michele Gunter filed a paternity action against Nicholas Todd Walter, alleging that he was the father of her child. Based upon Gunter’s representations that she had not had sexual relations with any other man, Walter consented to an order declaring him the father of the child. The court ordered Walter to pay Gunter child support in the amount of $43 per week.

Walter failed to pay much in the way of support. Nevertheless, in March 2000, Walter filed a motion for the court to order genetic testing to establish whether he was indeed the father. The testing proved that Walter could not be the father. As a result, the trial court relieved Walter of any prospective obligation to pay child support, but refused to absolve him of his obligation to pay the child support arrearage in the amount of $11,228 that had accrued through the date Walter requested the DNA testing. Walter appealed, and the Court of Appeals of Maryland heard his case. 

The Court of Appeals, in a split decision, reversed the ruling of the circuit court, and held that Walter did not have any obligation to pay any portion of the arrearage, saying, “we hold that Walter cannot be legally obligated for child support arrearages that result from a now-vacated paternity judgment.” 

In a stinging dissent, Judge Wilner argued that the Court’s decision rewarded Walter for his defiance of the child support order entered seven years earlier. Judge Wilner wrote:

 

“In the name of protecting the rights of men who father children and then walk away from them, the Court of Appeals has so dismantled the system for enforcing child support collection that, unless you are expecting a tax refund, are looking to the win the lottery, or are truly concerned about driving on a suspended license, there will be no effective sanction, and, if the time ever comes, years later, when you may be held to account, ask for a blood test. If you are lucky, you will escape all responsibility and may, when the next case is decided, actually be able to force your child to return anything you were ever forced to pay.” 

In defense of the majority opinion, Judge Battaglia noted that child support is a duty imposed by the law upon natural parents. Consequently, “a vacated paternity judgment effectively extinguishes that ‘legal duty arising from or imposed by law,’ and as that duty is extinguished, so too is the financial obligation attached to that duty.” 

Walter v. Gunter, Court of Appeals of Maryland, No. 41, Sept. Term, 2001, decided January 9, 2002

[Return to Family Law Update Page]

 

 
Practice Areas | Real Estate Law Resource Center | Family Law Resource Center | Our Attorneys | FAQ | Firm Information
Newsletters | Directions | Contact Us | Site Map | Home

Copyright © Warfield & Darrah, P.C., Severna Park, Maryland. All rights reserved.
Web Site by Consultwebs.com, Specializing In Webs For Lawyers